| CM:
I've heard you quoted as saying that if one wants to be a writer of
fantastic literature, or at least one worth his salt, it is imperative
to read everything but fantastic literature. Do you think of yourself
primarily as a "fantasy genre writer," or simply as a thinker
and writer who finds a certain mode best for expressing his ideas?
Or do you think questions of genre are simply irrelevant unless one
is employed in a publisher's marketing division and is trying to tell
the chain bookstores on which shelf to put the softcovers?
MM:
That's my standard advice to people who want to write fantasy: Stop
reading fantasy. I read very little in the genre and never read
as widely as most. I have no special liking for it, but I do have
a talent for it, so I suppose you can say I took the line of least
resistance. I have never really thought of myself as a fantasy writer
or a genre writer, although I've written plenty of genre, including
Westerns. But I began as a professional journalist and I tend to
think of myself as a professional writer. I started in Fleet Street
(actually just off Fleet Street) when I was l6. For many years I
wrote very little fantasy or genre, but mostly features or comic
strips about Vikings or Romans!
The question's
not irrelevant. Snobbery is a huge factor in a creative artist's
lifeas is fashion. Categorizing has the effect of helping
the snob determine what they won't read. Snobs are much happier
with the arts than science because you can have an opinion without
any information on the arts, but you need to know what you're talking
about in the sciences. As a result, a certain section of "educated"
society makes science less respectable a subjecti.e. the snobbery
has to exclude the entire subject because snobbery wing any of it.
Badly educated Englit [English Lit] majors are, therefore, one of
the worst aspects of the phenomenon. They tend to get the jobs as
lit editors and off you go. It's far worse in America where the
snobbery is even more endemic. Snobbery is the last resort of the
intellectually inadequate. Most of my first books, like Behold
the Man and The Final Programme were not published as
genre fiction. None of the Cornelius books, nor Gloriana,
were published as genre in the U.K. They were published as genre
in the U.S. (where much of my non-fantastic fiction isn't availableyou
can buy Mother London in Italian or French, but you can't
buy it in America).
CM:
You've already mentioned Brackett, Steerpike, Richard III, Byron,
the Norse trickster god Loki, and Gothic literature as influences
on the Chaos lord Arioch from the Elric series (in response
to my earlier query about Milton's Satan being a possible inspiration
for the character). More in general, what written works or personal
experiences do you feel have been most influential on your own writing
and personal philosophy? What are you reading right now?
MM:
My influences are a mixture, like everyone's, and include movies
and radio, of course. But Peake was probably the one writer who
made me realize it was possible to do my own thing and use fantastic
imagery at the same time. Two writers I admired and knew were very
considerable influences on mePeake
as an imaginative novelist and Angus
Wilson as a social novelist. Wilson was once regarded
as the leading literary figure in England. What people didn't know
was that as an sf advisor to Sidgwick and Jackson he also bought
Alfred Bester's Demolished Man
and Tiger,
Tiger, which were also massive influences on my sf.
Bester remains the single greatest influence, I think. Bradbury
and Dick were others I admired.
But my
romantic relish was for the pulps in which Brackett, Bradbury and
Dick, amongst others, appeared. I have no particular nostalgia for
pulps as such, but in those days you could find really good writers
therewhat you might call anti-modernists rather than post-modernists.
The pulps, by and large, never paid much attention to modernism.
G.B. Shaw was a big influence on me as a boy, as were Wells and
Huxley. I read Wells's History of the World and Huxley's
The Perennial Philosophy, which gave me a broader view of
the world's experience, and went on from there. I'm largely self-educated,
having been to a number of schools briefly.
I'm not
reading much fiction at all at he moment because I'm writing two
books at the same time and that's more than enough fiction. Mostly
it's when I have to review something. I liked Dworkin's Scapegoat,
about the failure of Israeli men to incorporate their women allies
into the system. I recently read Landor's Tower by Iain Sinclair,
which is, of course, highly inventive and outside genre. I enjoyed
Perdido Street Station by Mieville, but liked his King
Rat better. Perdido Street had too many genre elements
for me to be wholly enthusiastic. I dip in to Tim Etchells' wonderful
Endland Stories and I love M. John Harrison's short storiesTravel
Arrangements recently out. I admire writers like VanderMeer,
Rhys Hughes, Steve Aylett and feel I should be finding more women
I like. Annie Proulx, Ellen Gilchrist, Sheena Mackay are all writers
I like. Glad to see Maureen Duffy's Capital back in print
(experimental novel about London done before Mother London) and
that Gerald Kersh is coming back, too.
I subscribe
to a wonderful company called Persephone
who specialize in reprinting modernist fiction by "forgotten"
women writers. They have turned up some great stuff. I am a huge
fan of Elizabeth Bowen, for instance, and her Death of the Heart
remains one of my all-time favorites, along with Victory
by Conrad, with which I bizarrely associate it.
CM:
You're certainly one of the most prolific writers in the fantastic
or any other genre. In fact, I can find no exact count of how many
books, novellas, short stories, and articles you've written. How
do you manage to be so busy? Also, though we're conducting this
interview via computer, when you write, do you still use a typewriter,
or have you switched over to a [bad joke alert] world processor?
MM:
Good health, natural energy and a training which taught you that
anxiety cost time and money and was best channeled into doing the
work. I work on anxiety-poweror used to. It was easier to
write a book in three days than sit about getting more and more
anxious about it for weeks. . . I'm a story teller. I have stories
to tell. I'd be telling them somehow, no matter what. One story
leads to another. I have, an old lover once said, an unsleeping
mind. I wake up thinking. My wife hates me in the mornings. I'm
curious about stuff.
A computer
proved a huge boon to mefor the 'net as much as the word processing.
I came fairly late to composing onto the WP and still tend to do
most of my work in long handI draw scenes pretty much the
way a movie director wouldsketching out a story board as I
go. I'm very visual. My notebooks have as much visual material in
them as written notes.
Next:
"Tolkien
has the right elements of snobbery and escapism to make it a huge
success."
|
|
|